![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Where I can see the air I breathe...
Posts: 204
Vehicle: Original owner of my 3-pdl 1997 Nissan Hardbody King Cab XE 2WD 5-spd.
Thanks: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Home
Posts: 5
Vehicle: 2013 NISSAN FRONTIER SVV6 KC 2WD AT Original Owner ~ 1993 NISSAN HARDBODY KC 4CYL 2WD AT(SOLD)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Personally I don't think that they should have gone with a Smaller Engine than the 4 Liter. Going from a 5 speed AT to a 9 speed AT, I'm not sure about either, but I understand that they are trying to get more out of the Engine Power Band at a more complicated Transmission. I haven't driven the 2020 Frontier yet or read about those that have used it for Pulling a Load. Frankly I think they should have gone with a slightly bigger engine, like a 4.3L or 4.5L with a towing capacity of 8,000 lbs. IMO they should stay with a Metal Front Bumper, but they didn't ask me. I get they are trying to give it a car like front end to lure The Suv'rs into a Truck, but I hate Plastic on the Front or Back End of a Truck. I understand that the Wife want's a Car and the Husband want's a Truck so they try to make a Truck that's a compromise. Maybe when the '21 New Frontier Body Style come's out it will have a Metal Front Bumper. IMO they should be useing the New Mirror Polished SS for Front and Rear Bumper's like they have for Step Rail's, but a little thicker for a Bumper. If they were concerned with weight, they could have gone with a polished Aluminum Bumper, which would have been better than Plastic IMO.
__________________
2013 SVV6 Frontier AT, 2WD oo, Previous '93 Hardbody 4cyl, AT, 2WD sold @ 20 year's 174K mile's oo.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|